sortbib(1) (BSD Compatibility Package) sortbib(1)
NAME
sortbib - sort a bibliographic database
SYNOPSIS
/usr/ucb/sortbib [ -skey-letters ] database...
DESCRIPTION
The sortbib command sorts files of records containing refer key-
letters by user-specified keys. Records may be separated by blank
lines, or by `.[' and `.]' delimiters, but the two styles may not be
mixed together. This program reads through each database and pulls
out key fields, which are sorted separately. The sorted key fields
contain the file pointer, byte offset, and length of corresponding
records. These records are delivered using disk seeks and reads, so
sortbib may not be used in a pipeline to read standard input.
By default, sortbib alphabetizes by the first %A and the %D fields,
which contain the senior author and date. The -s option is used to
specify new key-letters. See addbib for a list of the most common
key letters. For instance, -sATD will sort by author, title, and
date, while -sA+D will sort by all authors, and date. Sort keys past
the fourth are not meaningful. No more than 16 databases may be
sorted together at one time. Records longer than 4096 characters
will be truncated.
sortbib sorts on the last word on the %A line, which is assumed to be
the author's last name. A word in the final position, such as `jr.'
or `ed.', will be ignored if the name beforehand ends with a comma.
Authors with two-word last names or unusual constructions can be
sorted correctly by using the nroff convention `\0' in place of a
blank. A %Q field is considered to be the same as %A, except sorting
begins with the first, not the last, word. sortbib sorts on the last
word of the %D line, usually the year. It also ignores leading
articles (like `A' or `The') when sorting by titles in the %T or %J
fields; it will ignore articles of any modern European language. If
a sort-significant field is absent from a record, sortbib places that
record before other records containing that field.
SEE ALSO
addbib(1), indxbib(1), lookbib(1), refer(1), roffbib(1).
NOTES
Records with missing author fields should probably be sorted by
title.
8/91 Page 1